The truth is that marriage is a civil and legal institution in our nation, separate from the (Catholic) Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, separate from any other religion's conception of marriage. It conveys both rights and responsibilities to the couples who choose to become married, and we have such a civil and legal institution because we recognize the benefits it brings to society as a whole—benefits which are far more than just bringing forth and raising children. The change in the law of New York does not change the nature of the sacrament of marriage (if you accept that article of faith), nor does it require the Church to recognize or perform homosexual marriages contrary to its teachings. It does mean that the state recognizes that homosexual couples who are willing to commit to a single loving relationship and to fulfill the duties and responsibilities that the state asks of heterosexual couples also deserve to have the same rights and benefits of those heterosexual couples.

And let's not forget, the state already doesn't make the same demands for a lifelong relationship that the Church does, so heterosexual marriage under the state and nation already is not the same as the Catholic sacrament of marriage. It's really this simple: if you believe that the Church's teachings on marriage must be enforced upon all citizens with respect to homosexual couples, regardless of their personal faith or culture, then you should also be campaigning against civil divorce. You should also be campaigning against the state recognition of any kind of marriage that the Catholic Church does not recognize as falling within the faith—no atheists can marry, no Buddhists, no Muslims, no Jews, and frankly I think a lot of the various Protestant / so-called Christian denominations are on shaky grounds as well.

Unfortunately I don't have time to get into this further. But I'm going to post what I have for now.
◾ Tags:
On the Sk8J forum, someone asked for people's thoughts on the news of Osama bin Laden's death at the hands of a United States team sent to capture or kill him. I wrote some out, and thought that would make a good post for today. I'm expanding a bit on some of them, too.

First, I'm mildly surprised. I'd simply stopped thinking about Osama bin Laden, and while I can't say that I believed it would never happen, I also can't say I ever expected it would happen.

Second, as I posted on Facebook already, my immediate reaction was to start imagining how the Republican/neo-conservative camp would try to spin this to make President Obama look bad—why did it take him so long, why is he focused on that instead of the economy, et cetera ad nauseam. The corollary reaction was to realize I'm more sour on American politics than I was aware. And to my more-conservative friends, yes, I'm sure the Democrats and liberals have been equally quick to seek political points to score against Republican presidents in the past when those presidents have had some accomplishment to announce. 

Third, I do think it's a worthy blow in our defense—and the defense of the world—and a fitting end, that we were able to send our own team in to capture or kill him and succeed at that goal. Capture, trial, and imprisonment (or execution) would have been nice if possible, but I'm not sure it would've been any more meaningful. 

Fourth, in much the same way that at a certain point the question was no longer whether Obama could be elected president but how well we as a nation would be able to move forward and recover from our messes under his direction, I think the question at this point is how we as a nation will move forward in handling issues of terrorism and security, here at home and abroad. Or in other words, although finally killing Osama bin Laden is a good achievement and worth some celebration, it only highlights the greater problems we've been struggling with in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. 

Finally, another friend's reaction on Facebook was to say "I can't say I'm sorry he's dead." That prompted me to wonder whether there's anyone out there in the world who is truly sincerely grieving for the death of Osama bin Laden the person—not the terrorist organizer or religious-political crusader, perhaps, depending on your point of view, but the father, brother, uncle, or friend he may have been. I do not mourn him, and I do not blame anyone for hating him. But at some point he was a human person, and it may be better to pity that lost opportunity of the human he could have been than to glory in the destruction of the monster he became.
◾ Tags:
From Dino Rossi's concession speech, as reported on Slog:

"You’ve heard me say during this campaign that the problems we face are too big for one political party. They are, and I can say that with absolute certainty. It is my hope that the new House and Senate will address them seriously, responsibly, and in a bipartisan way. I hope the President and Senate Democrats will join the new House majority to face these problems head on rather than leaving them for the next Congress or the next generation."

Fuck you, you fucking fuck.

If the fucking Republicans had been willing in the past two years to address the problems we face in a serious, responsible, and bipartisan way, we wouldn't be in as much trouble as we still are. Instead they've done everything they can at every single turn to obstruct and prevent any action proposed by the president or the Democratic members of Congress to address the problems we face—even when the Democrats made concession after concession and the president bent over backwards to attempt productive dialogue with the Republicans—without making a single substantive counter-proposal of their own. But now, of course, now it's time for Congress to act in a bipartisan way, by which the Republicans mean doing exactly what they want, no compromises.

And for the record, the Democrats are hardly saints, and have many failings of their own. But they're not the ones who are obviously out to fuck over the people of America in every way possible, so long as it benefits their wealthy corporate overlords.

At least that jackass Rossi won't be in the Senate, furthering the ruin of our nation.

Facebook friends, be forewarned, it's highly unlikely I'm going to have the patience and time to discuss this in the comments on Facebook. Or even here on LiveJournal. If for no other reason than because this is an obviously emotional reaction to the elections and the political events of the past couple years, not a well-thought-out and nuanced political statement.
◾ Tags:
"I know you didn’t do this just to win an election and I know you didn’t do it for me. You did it because you understand the enormity of the task that lies ahead. For even as we celebrate tonight, we know the challenges that tomorrow will bring are the greatest of our lifetime – two wars, a planet in peril, the worst financial crisis in a century. Even as we stand here tonight, we know there are brave Americans waking up in the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan to risk their lives for us. There are mothers and fathers who will lie awake after their children fall asleep and wonder how they’ll make the mortgage, or pay their doctor’s bills, or save enough for college. There is new energy to harness and new jobs to be created; new schools to build and threats to meet and alliances to repair.

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term, but America – I have never been more hopeful than I am tonight that we will get there. I promise you – we as a people will get there.

"There will be setbacks and false starts. There are many who won’t agree with every decision or policy I make as President, and we know that government can’t solve every problem. But I will always be honest with you about the challenges we face. I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. And above all, I will ask you join in the work of remaking this nation the only way it’s been done in America for two-hundred and twenty-one years – block by block, brick by brick, calloused hand by calloused hand.

"What began twenty-one months ago in the depths of winter must not end on this autumn night. This victory alone is not the change we seek – it is only the chance for us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to the way things were. It cannot happen without you.

"So let us summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves, but each other. Let us remember that if this financial crisis taught us anything, it’s that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers – in this country, we rise or fall as one nation; as one people.

"Let us resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long. Let us remember that it was a man from this state who first carried the banner of the Republican Party to the White House – a party founded on the values of self-reliance, individual liberty, and national unity. Those are values we all share, and while the Democratic Party has won a great victory tonight, we do so with a measure of humility and determination to heal the divides that have held back our progress. As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours, “We are not enemies, but friends…though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection.” And to those Americans whose support I have yet to earn – I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voices, I need your help, and I will be your President too."

—President-Elect Barack Obama, November 5, 2008

Listen to (and watch) the entire speech
◾ Tags:
My friend Scott D, who writes the fishsuit blog, posted an entry today about attending a Democratic caucus here in Seattle. In his post, he articulated precisely what annoys me about the party's decision to ignore the primary:

...we have a primary in Washington, but the Democratic party has decided to ignore it when awarding delegates. In other words, you are free to vote in the primary, but if you actually want your vote to count, you have to leave your child with your spouse and haul your ass to an elementary school on a Saturday afternoon.

I assume that the party does this because in Washington state, by law, you do not have to declare a party affiliation to vote in a primary. This is perfect for independent-minded voters like myself: I can choose which party I want to support based on the candidates. It’s presumably terrible for a political party machine that wants to control who their nominee is. (Why else would the Democrats reserve nearly 20% of their national delegates for party insiders?)

They still can’t legally require you to be a Democrat to participate in the caucus — as they admit through clenched teeth in their FAQ (“Q: Do I have to be a registered Democrat to vote in the Caucus? A. Washington State does not require a voter to register by Party.”) — so the party makes it more difficult for people to participate in order to insure that only the true blue Democrats will come.

I too prefer to consider myself independent - not capital-I third-party Independent, just independent - because I want to elect the best person for the job, not to put a particular group ideology into power. So I resent any party-based aspects of our electoral system. I plan to vote in the primary, even though I know if I choose to vote for a Democratic candidate, my vote will be ignored. It's not much of a protest, but it is my right to vote.

I'm not so naive to think that we can do away with political parties, or even that nothing good can ever come of having them. However, I can't help wondering, if all elections were mandated non-partisan, would that help loosen the death-grip of the two party system and allow a little more choice and diversity into our government? Or would that just make corrupt/unethical party dealings harder to observe and prevent?



On a completely unrelated note, Mono In VCF put on a gorgeous show. Expect a review later today (Sunday).
◾ Tags:

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2345 6 78
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags